before you are ready to ready the ten books in IPE that you have to read, you should first read these ten books on global economic history. This would be a weird collection of scattered knowledge, ranging from the 1860 Cobden-Chevalier Treaty to the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act to the birth of the Washington Consensus. That said, the opportunity cost can be significant – a failure to learn anything about global economic history beyond the stylized facts contained in the most-cited articles. There are some pretty good reasons to learn these techniques – among other things, they’ll help you to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to what blogs, pundits and public intellectuals are saying about the global economy. If you’re expecting me to go off on a rant here about the uselessness of these tools, well, you’re going to be sadly disappointed. students at one of the top IPE schools in the country, and the students (and some of the professors) made it pretty clear that they didn’t know all that much about the topic beyond the tricks of the trade – formal modeling, econometric techniques, etc. The thing is, most graduate programs in political economy don’t give you that much historical background before throwing the cutting-edge theory and methodology at you.
An intense undergraduate student who really wants to study IPE.A grad student seeking the keys to success in the profession.A curious professor ready to minimize this page if anyone walks in.Let’s face it, if you have read this far in the post, it means you’re either: So I’ve decided… to postpone that list for another month or two. Judging by the e-mail response, the demand is robust and quite persistent.
Get our weekly free Must-Read newsletter.Back in the spring, I hinted that I would be willing to produce a top ten list of must-read books on the international political economy/global political economy (IPE or GPE for those in the know), provided there was sufficient demand. In a panel discussion, Shen also dismissed interpretation of China’s “dual circulation” as a sign the country is “looking inward,” while offering support for Hong Kong and saying the financial center will play a “strong role” for Chinese firms and international investors interested in China.Ĭontact editor Joshua Dummer our app to receive breaking news alerts and read the news on the go. counterparts and communication is smooth and open, Shen said.Ĭhina has also tightened requirements for overseas listings, enacting cybersecurity reviews for firms that collect mass data, leading to multiple deals being shelved. The CRSC is “working very hard” to resolve the audit oversight issues with their U.S. inspection of accounting work done for Chinese firms, though China has long refused to do so citing national security concerns. Securities and Exchange Commission in March began implementing new rules that require U.S. lawmakers last year enacted a bill that threatens to delist Chinese firms that fail to meet audit inspection rules.
The regulator fully supports Chinese firms in picking Hong Kong as a primary listing venue, he said. relationship, said Shen Bing, director-general of the Department of International Affairs at China Securities Regulatory Commission, at a Securities and Futures Commission forum in Hong Kong. market would hurt firms, global investors and the China-U.S. as he offered broad support for Hong Kong as an international financial center and venue for stock listings.ĭelistings from the U.S. exchanges would be a setback for the companies as well as for relations with the U.S. (Bloomberg) - A top official at China’s securities watchdog said Chinese firms being delisted from U.S.